독도오류표기 사이버단 > 항의서한발송

:::::: 나라[독도]살리기운동본부 ::::::

이 름

패스워드

서한

시정서한 친선서한 항의서한

제 목

매체

일본교과서 전세계교과서 관광 문화출판물 웹사이트 스마트폰 게임 영화 드라마

이슈

동해 독도/영토 역사 문화/유산 그외이슈

언어

서한보내는곳

오류내용

E-mail / Contact

서론

본론

Firstly, the designation of February 22 as "Takeshima Day" by the Shimane government in 2005 is indeed problematic. The islets, known as Dokdo in Korea, have been under South Korean administration since 1954. This administration is not an "effective control" as described in your article but is a rightful exercise of sovereignty over territory that has historically belonged to Korea. The designation of "Takeshima Day" and the subsequent ceremonies reinforce Japan's unfounded territorial claims and contribute to the misrepresentation of historical facts.   <o:p></o:p>Moreover, the article states that South Korea has "stationed security personnel on the islets" and taken "effective control of them" since 1954. This phrasing suggests that South Korea's presence on Dokdo is an act of occupation, which is not the case. South Korea's sovereignty over Dokdo is based on historical evidence and international recognition. The islets have been recognized as Korean territory since ancient times, and Korea's administrative activities on Dokdo are legitimate and lawful.   <o:p></o:p>The article also refers to the islets as being in the "Sea of Japan." While this name is commonly used internationally, it is important to acknowledge that the body of water is also known as the "East Sea" in Korea. Using both names (East Sea/Sea of Japan) would provide a more balanced view and respect the historical and cultural significance of the name "East Sea" for Koreans.   <o:p></o:p>Lastly, the overall tone of the article seems to legitimize Japan's territorial claims over Dokdo without presenting the historical context and legal evidence that support Korea's sovereignty. This is particularly concerning given the sensitive nature of the territorial dispute and the need for accurate and fair reporting to foster mutual understanding and cooperation between the two countries.   <o:p></o:p>For a more balanced and accurate representation, I kindly request that you:   <o:p></o:p>1. Acknowledge the historical and legal basis of Korea's sovereignty over Dokdo.2. Use the dual naming convention (East Sea/Sea of Japan) to reflect the differing perspectives.<div id="hwpEditorBoardContent" class="hwp_editor_board_content" data-hjsonver="1.0" data-jsonlen="10916"></div>3. Provide a more nuanced view of the territorial dispute, including Korea's historical claims and current administrative activities on Dokdo.<div id="hwpEditorBoardContent" class="hwp_editor_board_content" data-hjsonver="1.0" data-jsonlen="8961"></div>

결론

<div id="hwpEditorBoardContent" class="hwp_editor_board_content" data-hjsonver="1.0" data-jsonlen="6022"></div>Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and hope that future articles will reflect a more balanced and accurate perspective on this important issue.   <o:p></o:p>Best regards,Yuri Hwang   <o:p></o:p><div id="hwpEditorBoardContent" class="hwp_editor_board_content" data-hjsonver="1.0" data-jsonlen="8763"></div>

링크 #1

링크 #2

파일첨부

왼쪽의 글자를 입력하세요.