However, I would like to bring to your attention a discrepancy in the article regarding the location of the islets. The article mentions that these islets are located in the "Sea of Japan." While this term is widely recognized, it is important to also acknowledge the name "East Sea," which has been used in Korea for over 2,000 years.
To provide some historical context, the designation 'East Sea' has deep cultural and historical significance in Korea, supported by numerous historical sources and ancient maps. The term 'Sea of Japan' became more prevalent in the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly during Japan's period of colonial expansion.
Given the ongoing discussions and differing perspectives on this issue, I respectfully request that your publication consider using the term "East Sea" alongside "Sea of Japan" in future articles. This approach not only reflects the historical and cultural significance of the term 'East Sea' but also promotes a balanced representation of the views held by both Korea and Japan.
Therefore, I kindly ask that the location of Dokdo/Takeshima in your recent article be amended to reflect "East Sea" or "East Sea (Sea of Japan)." Such an amendment would contribute to a more accurate and comprehensive portrayal of the geopolitical context surrounding these islets.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your commitment to journalistic accuracy and look forward to your cooperation in ensuring balanced reporting.
Sincerely,
Yuri Hwang