|
¼ÇÑ |
|
|
¸Åü |
À¥»çÀÌÆ®
|
|
À̽´ |
|
|
¾ð¾î |
¿µ¾î
|
|
¼ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ |
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/08/01/national/shimane-confirms-1760s-maps-showing-takeshima-as-part-of-japan/#.UkeuTROwfIU |
|
¿À·ù³»¿ë |
µ¶µµ°¡ takeshima·Î Ç¥±â |
|
E-mail / Contact |
»çÀÌÆ® ³» contact us |
|
¼·Ð |
Dear The Japan Times
With my deepest respect and gratitude, I take it as a great honor to write to your website. I am Lee-Hee Kim, and am proud to introduce myself to be one of the people of the Republic of Korea and a student of Hana Academy Seoul.
I also work as an active member of the Dokdo Cyber Press, a non-governmental and voluntary organization with the mandate to provide correct information about Korea to the international community, including textbook publishers.
I am writing to you as I have important suggestions to make in regards to your articles titled the ¡°Shimane confirms 1760s maps showing Takeshima as part of Japan"
|
|
º»·Ð |
To my great surprise, I found out that a article of yours have wrongly named the ¡°Dokdo¡± as the ¡°Takeshima.¡±
The name of the sea between the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese archipelago, currently named as the ¡°Takeshima¡± in your article, should be corrected to the ¡°Dokdo.¡±
At present, as many international organizations including U. N. agencies have corrected ¡®Takeshima¡¯ to ¡®Dokdo¡¯, I¡¯d truly appreciate if your web site could join this trend.
As a Korean who is fully aware of how the island is enthusiastically beloved by our people, I could not help but write to your company.
|
|
°á·Ð |
I humbly ask for your website to seriously consider the issue of changing the ¡°takeshima¡± to the ¡°Dokdo.¡± Or, at least, please name it both 'Takeshima' and 'Dokok'. Please visit the website (http://dokdo.mofat.go.kr) for more specific information on geographical designations.
I would like to once again appreciate your time for reviewing my letter and will be more than honored to get reply from your university via my e-mail (leehee9749@naver.com).
Yours sincerely,
Lee-Hee, Kim
|