작성일 : 17-05-09 10:21
|
웹사이트
|
 |
|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
웹사이트
|
|
| 이슈 |
|
|
| 언어 |
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/takeshima/ |
|
| 오류내용 |
|
|
| E-mail / Contact |
|
|
서론 |
Dear webmaster Hello webmaster? My name is Grace Heejung Min who lives in south Korea and studies oceanography. My work is to deal with mistakes made by people about Dokdo, (a.k.a Takeshima). I found some mistakes in your website I want to talk about.
|
|
| 본론 |
You made a point that Dokdo, which you call Takeshima, Japan's. However, there are mistakes you must change. I have to make a point that As to Dokdo's historical legitimacy, in 512 AD, the Silla Kingdom (one of
the Three Kingdoms of ancient Korea) conquered Usan-guk (Usan State), of which
the main part was Ulleungdo. Since then, the Korean people have considered Dokdo
to be a part of Ulleungdo. The subsequent Korean states, namely the Goryeo
Kingdom (918~1392), the Joseon Kingdom (1392~1897), the Daehan (or Korean)
Empire (1897~1910) and the Republic of Korea (since 1948), have exercised
sovereignty over Dokdo.
Also all historical records, available
from both Korea and Japan, show unexceptionally indicate that Dokdo has since
time immemorial been Korean territory and that there has never been a time in
ancient history that the islands have not appertained to Korea
|
|
| 결론 |
I have many more statement to make but since I can't write all of it, I will probably stop here. This is my opinion about Dokdo. Please know Dokdo is Korea's territory and I really appreciate you for sharing your ideas. I look forward to your reply sincerely Grace Min |
|
조회 : 1,578
