:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 13-04-24 12:36
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : ÀúÇö°íÀÌâ¿­
Á¶È¸ : 1,053  
   http://www.mkoreadokdo.com/bbs/link.php?bo_table=error_04&wr_id=209&no¡¦ [297]
µ¶µµ Ç¥±â ¿À·ù
¼­ÇÑ  
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ soumu@pref.shimane.lg.jp
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ¸¦ ´ÙÄɽø¶·Î Ç¥±â(write Takeshima rather than Dokdo)
E-mail / Contact soumu@pref.shimane.lg.jp
¼­·Ð
Dear, Web manager
Hi, I'm a student who loves to learn history. I want to tell something wrong in your article (http://www.mkoreadokdo.com/bbs/link.php?bo_table=error_04&wr_id=209&no=1&page=18) Korean calls this island call Dokdo. Your country calls takeshima. However, it should be called Dokdo exactly. I will tell you the reason.


º»·Ð
First, Japan said that they settled Dokdo first before Silla conquer this island in 512. However, arguement about Russian - Japanese war, Your country said that Japan conquer this island because there was no owner of the island. As you can see, your country's arguements have conflict theirselves. Then, tell me what is true. The arguement also say that even though Silla had taken over Usan, the island, Dokdo which your contry is saying Takeshima, didn't belong to Silla's territory. This opinion has conflict with others which means that they might be faked or have no time to check them because your contry just keep eyes on the benefits.

°á·Ð
So, I request that again, please chang all the world Takeshima to Dokdo. However, if you still think Takshima is true, send the evidence to me, greeksophist@naver.com

 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]