|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
|
|
| 이슈 |
동해
|
|
| 언어 |
영어
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
http://image.baidu.com/i?ct=503316480&z=0&tn=baiduimagedetail&word=sea%20of%20japan&ie=utf-8&in=7610&cl=2&lm=-1&st=&pn=134&rn=1&di=168403320050&ln=866&fr=&fm=&fmq=1352646669158_R&ic=&s=&se=&sme=0&tab=&width=&height=&face=&is=&istype=#pn134&-1&di1684033200 |
|
| 오류내용 |
동해를 일본해로 표기하였다. |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
|
|
서론 |
To Whomever It May Concern
관계자 분에게
Recently I visited your website below: (오류가 있는 사이트 주소를 입력합니다)
And I was quite surprised to find your websites still label Korea's 'East Sea' as 'Sea of Japan,' which is incorrect. Such an error on such a well-known website such as yours comes as a surprise since we regard you as one of the world's best.
최근에 당신의 웹사이트를 방문했을 때 당신의 웹 페이지에서 '동해' 대신 '일본해'라고 표기되어 있는 것을 발견하고, 한국인의 한 사람이자 세계인의 한 사람으로서 매우 놀라웠습니다. 세계에서 가장 큰 기관 중 하나로 생각해 왔던 당신의 웹사이트에서 이러한 실수를 하고 있다는 것은 상당히 놀라운 일이었습니다.
|
 |
Using a proper name for the body of water between the Korean peninsula and the Japanese archipelago is not simply a question of changing the name of a geographical feature. It is part of the national effort by the Korean people to erase the legacy of Japanese Imperialism and to redress the unfairness that has resulted from it.
한반도와 일본열도 사이에 있는 바다의 올바른 이름을 사용하고자 하는 것은 단지 지리학적인 이름을 바꾸는 문제만이 아닙니다. 일본제국주의의 잔재를 바로 잡고 그 잔재를 통한 불합리를 줄이려는 한국인의 노력인 것입니다.
It is an absolute mistake to hear just one side of the story and to blindly follow. If we leave these kinds of things alone, it causes serious problems that disturb the order of international society.
어느 한쪽의 일방적인 주장에 의한 사실을 그대로 받아들이는 것은 분명히 잘못된 것이며, 이러한 일들이 이대로 방치된다면 국제사회의 질서를 유지하는데 심각한 어려움을 초래하게 될 것입니다.
For your reference, Dorling & Kindersley, one of biggest textbook publishers, worldatlas.com, one of prominent online map provider, and one of the biggest mapmakers, National Geographic promised us that they would now use the name 'East Sea.' In addition, these websites are already using the name, 'East Sea' on their website after we pointed out the error.
참고로 세계 최대 교과서 출판사 중 하나인 돌링&카인더슬리, 온라인 지도 제작사 월드아틀라스, 세계 최대 지도제작사 중 하나인 내셔널 지오그래픽에서 '동해'라고 표기할 것을 반크에 약속했고, 이미 웹사이트상에서 동해표기를 하고 있습니다.
http://prkorea.com/textbook/reference1.htm
http://prkorea.com/textbook/reference2.htm
http://prkorea.com/textbook/reference3.htm
http://www.prkorea.com/english/e_truth/e_truth6_2.htm
As a member of the Voluntary Agency Network of Korea (VANK), I urge you to use 'East Sea' to describe the body of water in question or to use both Korean and Japanese designation simultaneously (e.g. 'East Sea/Sea of Japan') in all of your contents and maps.
그래서 반크 회원의 한 사람으로서 저는 당신의 기관에서도 모든 내용과 세계지도에 "동해"를 단독으로 사용하거나 혹은 '동해'와 '일본해'의 두 이름을 동시에 사용해줄 것을 요청합니다.
According to IHO and UNCSGN, in case of topographical feature shared with two or more countries, yet naming differently in their own languages, all of the names in each language should be marked. To read full sentences of these gists, please visit this website at http://www.prkorea.com/english/e_truth/e_truth3_3.htm
|
 |
Once Korea and Japan agree on a common designation, that is in accord with the general rule of international cartography, we will then follow the agreed-on designation.
한국과 일본이 동일한 명칭에 대해서 위의 결의안의 내용대로 합의한다면 그에 따른 합의된 명칭을 사용할 수 있게 될 것입니다.
Thank you for reading and we would appreciate your favorable consideration.
We would be grateful for your explanation as to why you chose to use ‘Sea of Japan’.
Please email us at eastsea@prkorea.org.
읽어주셔서 감사하고 고려해 주시면 감사하겠습니다
우리의 의견에 대한 당신의 입장을 들을 수 있기를 바랍니다.
이메일은 eastsea@prkorea.org로 보내주세요
Yours very truly,
VANK, Cyber Diplomatic Organization in Korea
http://www.prkorea.com
*References
※The Historical precedent for the 'East Sea'
http://www.prkorea.com/english/eastsea.html
※How to name the sea area between the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese Archipelago
http://www.prkorea.com/english/eastsea2.html
"Though it is the smallest of all your seeds, yet when it grows,
it is the largest of garden plants and becomes a tree,
so that the birds of the air come and perch in its branches." - [Matthew] -
| To Whomever It May Concern
Recently I visited your website below: http://image.baidu.com/i?ct=503316480&z=0&tn=baiduimagedetail&word=sea%20of%20japan&ie=utf-8&in=7610&cl=2&lm=-1&st=&pn=134&rn=1&di=168403320050&ln=866&fr=&fm=&fmq=1352646669158_R&ic=&s=&se=&sme=0&tab=&width=&height=&face=&is=&istype=#pn134&-1&di168403320050&objURLhttp%3A%2F%2Fimage.sciencenet.cn%2Falbum%2F201102%2F20%2F132822uhbd559unhh0m5h6.jpg&fromURLhttp%3A%2F%2Fblog.renren.com%2Fshare%2F222739808%2F8019449417&W756&H527&T9008&S238&TPjpg
And I was quite surprised to find your websites still label Korea's 'East Sea' as 'Sea of Japan,' which is incorrect. Such an error on such a well-known website such as yours comes as a surprise since we regard you as one of the world's best.
|
|
| 본론 |
Using a proper name for the body of water between the Korean peninsula and the Japanese archipelago is not simply a question of changing the name of a geographical feature. It is part of the national effort by the Korean people to erase the legacy of Japanese Imperialism and to redress the unfairness that has resulted from it.
It is an absolute mistake to hear just one side of the story and to blindly follow. If we leave these kinds of things alone, it causes serious problems that disturb the order of international society.
For your reference, Dorling & Kindersley, one of biggest textbook publishers, worldatlas.com, one of prominent online map provider, and one of the biggest mapmakers, National Geographic promised us that they would now use the name 'East Sea.' In addition, these websites are already using the name, 'East Sea' on their website after we pointed out the error.
|
|
| 결론 |
Once Korea and Japan agree on a common designation, that is in accord with the general rule of international cartography, we will then follow the agreed-on designation.
Thank you for reading and we would appreciate your favorable consideration.
We would be grateful for your explanation as to why you chose to use ‘Sea of Japan’.
Yours very truly,
jung chi young |
조회 : 1,446
