The article notes that the new textbooks include expressions that assert Japan's claims over Dokdo. This is not only a misrepresentation of historical and legal facts but also an unjust attempt to instill a skewed perspective in the minds of the next generation. As a student who values the importance of unbiased education, I find it deeply troubling that such distorted narratives are being taught to young students, potentially shaping their worldview based on inaccurate information.
To ensure that future generations are educated with a balanced and factual understanding of this issue, I respectfully request the following:
1. **Acknowledge Korea's Sovereignty Over Dokdo:** The historical and legal foundations supporting Korea's sovereignty over Dokdo should be accurately represented in your reports. This will provide a more balanced view of the territorial dispute.
2. **Use Dual Naming Conventions:** Implement the use of both names, East Sea/Sea of Japan, and Dokdo/Takeshima, to reflect the differing perspectives and foster a more comprehensive understanding among readers.
3. **Promote Balanced Education:** Highlight the importance of presenting both sides of the historical and territorial arguments in educational materials. This approach will help students develop critical thinking skills and a more nuanced understanding of complex international issues.