The article notes, "But despite the flowery words in the diplomatic paper, thorny issues remain for the relationship, including the Japanese-claimed island of Takeshima, which is also claimed and administered by South Korea, where it is known as Dokdo." While you have acknowledged the dual naming of the islands, I believe it is essential to provide a more balanced perspective regarding the historical and legal context of the dispute.
Japan's claim that Dokdo is ¡°Japan's inherent territory in light of historical facts and under international law¡± fails to consider the extensive historical evidence supporting Korea's sovereignty over the islets. Historical documents and maps from various periods, including Japan's own maps before the late 19th century, often refer to these islets as Korean territory. Korea has maintained effective control over Dokdo for centuries, and this administration predates Japan's claims.
Moreover, the term 'East Sea' has been used in Korea for over 2,000 years, reflecting its cultural and historical significance. The name 'Sea of Japan' became more widespread during Japan's period of imperial expansion. It is vital for reporting on such sensitive issues to recognize these historical nuances and strive for balanced terminology.
To foster a deeper understanding and improve relations between Japan and Korea, it is crucial to accurately present historical facts and consider both perspectives. Balanced and precise reporting can play a significant role in promoting mutual understanding and cooperation between nations.