:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 24-05-12 23:57
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : ¼­¿ï´ëȲÀ¯¸®
Á¶È¸ : 353  
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/04/16/japan/politics/diplo-blue-book/ https://www.japantimes.co.jp/contact-us/
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://www.japantimes.co.jp/contact-us/
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ¸¦ takeshima¶ó°í ¿ÀÇ¥±âÇÔ.
E-mail / Contact https://www.japantimes.co.jp/contact-us/
¼­·Ð

Dear Jesse Johnson,

 

I hope this message finds you in good health. My name is Yuri Hwang, and I am a recent college graduate actively engaged in advocating for the recognition of "Dokdo" and the "East Sea" in Korea.

 

I am writing to you regarding your recent article titled "Japan's security environment at its 'most severe and complex,' policy report says," published on April 16, 2024. I appreciate your thorough coverage of the complex diplomatic relations and security environment in the Indo-Pacific region. However, I would like to address certain points in the article concerning the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the territorial dispute over Dokdo/Takeshima.

 



º»·Ð

The article notes, "But despite the flowery words in the diplomatic paper, thorny issues remain for the relationship, including the Japanese-claimed island of Takeshima, which is also claimed and administered by South Korea, where it is known as Dokdo." While you have acknowledged the dual naming of the islands, I believe it is essential to provide a more balanced perspective regarding the historical and legal context of the dispute.

 

Japan's claim that Dokdo is ¡°Japan's inherent territory in light of historical facts and under international law¡± fails to consider the extensive historical evidence supporting Korea's sovereignty over the islets. Historical documents and maps from various periods, including Japan's own maps before the late 19th century, often refer to these islets as Korean territory. Korea has maintained effective control over Dokdo for centuries, and this administration predates Japan's claims.

 

Moreover, the term 'East Sea' has been used in Korea for over 2,000 years, reflecting its cultural and historical significance. The name 'Sea of Japan' became more widespread during Japan's period of imperial expansion. It is vital for reporting on such sensitive issues to recognize these historical nuances and strive for balanced terminology.


To foster a deeper understanding and improve relations between Japan and Korea, it is crucial to accurately present historical facts and consider both perspectives. Balanced and precise reporting can play a significant role in promoting mutual understanding and cooperation between nations.



°á·Ð

Therefore, I respectfully request that future articles include references to the 'East Sea' alongside 'Sea of Japan' and provide a more nuanced view of the Dokdo/Takeshima dispute by acknowledging the historical evidence supporting Korea's claims. Such adjustments would contribute to a more comprehensive and balanced portrayal of the geopolitical context.


Thank you for your attention to this matter. I appreciate your commitment to journalistic integrity and look forward to your cooperation in ensuring accurate and balanced reporting.


Best regards,


Yuri Hwang


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]