Dear Yomiuri Shimbun,

I hope this message finds you well. My name is Yuri Hwang, and I am a college student actively involved in advocating for the recognition of "Dokdo" and the "East Sea" in Korea.

I am writing to address an issue I noticed in your recent political article titled "Japan Revamps Takeshima Website." Specifically, I observed that the islet known as "Takeshima" is incorrectly referred to as such when it should be rightfully recognized as "Dokdo." Understanding the importance of accuracy in geographical nomenclature, I wish to provide some historical context and strongly request the correction of this error in your articles moving forward.

The article states, "The website, 'Takeshima Research and Commentary,' provides introductions to the history of the islands organized by theme and chronological era, supported by archival documents ranging from evidence of Edo period (1603-1867) fishing activity to analysis of the Republic of Korea’s unlawful incursions after World War II." This statement not only misrepresents historical facts but also promotes a skewed narrative regarding the sovereignty of Dokdo. Furthermore, the article notes, "Created by the Office of Policy Planning and Coordination on Territory and Sovereignty, the site also features articles written by academics and other specialists on the subject, with the aim of educating a wider audience on how Takeshima is an inherent part of Japan." This effort to legitimize Japan's claims through academic endorsement is deeply troubling.

"Takeshima," often known as Liancourt Island, is an island located between Korea and Japan in the East Sea. However, it is crucial to note that the true name and sovereignty of this island is "Dokdo," despite Japan and other countries referring to it as "Takeshima."

I urge you to consider the extensive historical evidence supporting Dokdo's status as Korean territory. The website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea provides a comprehensive list of events and official records throughout history that affirm Dokdo's Korean sovereignty. I invite you to review these documents, which can be found at the following link: https://dokdo.mofa.go.kr/eng/dokdo/reason.jsp

These records meticulously document Korea's continuous administration and control of Dokdo since ancient times, predating any claims by Japan. Moreover, they highlight various instances where Korean sovereignty over Dokdo was recognized and affirmed by international entities.

I sincerely hope that these historical records will lead you to acknowledge the truth regarding Dokdo's sovereignty. Your cooperation in amending the designation of "Takeshima" to "Dokdo" in your political articles would not only demonstrate a commitment to accuracy but also contribute to promoting historical truths and fostering mutual understanding between nations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I eagerly await your response.

Sincerely,

Yuri Hwang