:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 19-07-26 09:07
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : Çϳª°í±èµ¿ÇÑ
Á¶È¸ : 250  
https://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article196615511/Japanisches-Meer-Es-geht-nur-um-den-Namen-Von-wegen.html
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´ µ¿ÇØ 
¾ð¾î µ¶ÀϾî
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ kundenservice@wams.de
¿À·ù³»¿ë Japanisches MeerÀ̶ó Ç¥±â
E-mail / Contact donghankim5@gmail.com
¼­·Ð



Dear webmaster,

 

Hello, I'm Donghan kim, student of Hana Academy Seoul, the Republic of Korea.

First of all, thank you for providing us various information.
However, while reading some articles, I found some errors. "East Sea" which is obviously territorial waters of South Korea was written as "Japanisches Meer".



º»·Ð




The sea between the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese Islands, called as "Japanisches Meer" in your article, is also called as ¡°East Sea.¡± So it needs to be corrected. In 1910, Japanese Empire invaded Korea and took control of it for 36 years. During that period, Japanese Empire marked the sea as ¡°Sea of Japan¡± because Koreans lost their sovereignty. But Korea already recovered its sovereignty over than 70 years ago. Therefore, it seems unreasonable to only use the name ¡°Sea of Japan¡± which symbolizes imperialism.



°á·Ð



I humbly ask for you to consider the issue of naming the sea both the "East Sea" and "Sea of Japan".

Thank you for your help, and I look forward to hearing from you via my email : donghankim5@gmail.com
Yours sincerely,


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]