:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 22-01-21 23:53
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : dz¹®°í°íÁÖ¿¬
Á¶È¸ : 612  
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-Dokdo-Takeshima-Source-Google_fig1_289878699
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ researchgate
¿À·ù³»¿ë
E-mail / Contact
¼­·Ð

Hello, I¡¯m Joo Yeon Ko. I am a high school student from South Korea.

I visited your website and found one problem. 

The reason I¡¯m writing this e-mail is to tell you that there is an error in your website¡¯s information.



º»·Ð

There is an island between Korea and Japan. It is a small island called Takeshima and Dokdo and some little rock. Called Takeshima in Japan, the island is currently attracting a lot of attention from both countries. Because it is located between the two countries, the Dokdo is a beautiful island that is quite precious and valuable. That is why we, the Joseon Dynasty, have been managing and governing this island Dokdo from a long time ago. In fact, in the history and records of the two countries, it is recorded that Chosun ruled the Dokdo, and it is not Japanese territory. Japan has been consistently claiming these Dokdo Islands recently, but this is clearly not correct. International law and historically, Dokdo has never been a Japanese territory, nor has its name ever been called Takeshima and not Dokdo. Besides these facts and history, it is a self-evident and natural fact that Dokdo is Korean territory. If Japan's insistence on deterrence continues, relations with Korea will deteriorate as well as cause social errors. This is clearly wrong, and you would want something not to happen. This message is sent to correct the name Takeshima on your website. Please remove the claim that Dokdo is Japanese territory on your website and correctly spell the name Takeshima as Dokdo. This concludes the message.



°á·Ð

Dokdo is Korean territory that has never been uninhabited. For this reason, Japan's territorial claim to the island is null and void because the doctrine of terra nullius, which grants the occupier of land belonging to no one ownership of the latter, does not apply to Dokdo. The Meiji government¡¯s decision to initially call Dokdo Korean territory and then later claim it as Japanese territory violates the principle of no deliberation of the same measure twice in the same legislative session. This is also a violation of the Meiji constitution and international law.

Therefore, I humbly ask you that you deliver the truth of Dokdo accordingly to your readers worldwide.


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]