There is a lot of information in this article that is incorrect.
First of all, it is not ¡®Dokdo¡¯, but ¡®Takeshima¡¯.
It also explains that 'the president of Korea invaded Takeshima' and 'Korea is illegally occupying Takeshima'.
From now on, I will explain why these information are wrong with one historical evidence.
First of all, what Japan is claiming is that Dokdo became Japanese territory in the ¡°San Francisco Reinforcement Treaty¡± signed in 1951.
Prior to the decision of the San Francisco Reinforcement Treaty, Dokdo was accurately listed as Korean territory in the Allied Agreement.
It is true that the place name for Dokdo was omitted from the Korean territory under the treaty, but it was omitted as an island belonging to Ulleungdo because Ulleungdo was listed.
And Britain, Australia and New Zealand among the allied countries strongly insisted that Dokdo is Korean territory.
Although the United States tried to incorporate Dokdo into Japan's territory, there were not all parts, but Japan's assertion of a unilateral view as the view of the San Francisco Treaty as a whole is an incorrect method and a distortion of history.