:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 21-05-08 22:54
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : Áß´ëºÎ°í±è½Ã¿¬
Á¶È¸ : 912  
https://www.kr.emb-japan.go.jp/territory/takeshima/g_ninchi.html
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://www.kr.emb-japan.go.jp/territory/takeshima/g_ninchi.html
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ°¡ ÀϺ»ÀÇ ¿µÅä¶ó ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù.
E-mail / Contact
¼­·Ð
Hello, this is Kim from Chung-ang High school. I would
 like to suggest you to fix your letter 
on your homepage.
 I think you guys are under an illusion that Dokdo is
 Japan's territory.
 First, I would like to inform you that rock island in East 
Sea(you may be confused as Sea of Japan)'s real name 
is Dokdo. Not a takeshima. 



º»·Ð
 You have said that "it can be confirmed from a variety of
 maps and documents that Japan has long recognized the
 existence of ¡°Takeshima¡± and ¡°Matsushima.¡±
However, we have recognized about Dokdo since 1145. 
It is far more before from Japan's map that mark Dokdo as 
Dakeshima and insist it is Japan's island.
Also, you said that  Ahn yong-bok is unrealiable people. 
However, information about Ahn yong-bok is written in
 detail at a lot history.
Usan island is  undoubtedly different from Ulleng island. 
In many maps, there are two island in East Sea, and there are no
 island that are big enough to be marked in map.



°á·Ð
Japan's knowledge about Ulleng island and Dokdo is so terrible.
One of that example is that The Army and Navy of Japan called 
 Ulleng island and Dokdo differently. 
 If you continue to say us that Dokdo is your island, it would 
be same as Nazi saying Europe as their territory. 
You should keep that in mind. 


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]