|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
웹사이트
|
|
| 이슈 |
|
|
| 언어 |
영어
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
https://thediplomat.com/write-for-us/ |
|
| 오류내용 |
Takeshima 역사적으로 일본영토임을 옛 문헌을 중심으로 주장함을 소개함. 한국의 입장도 약간은 언급하나 주로 일본의 주장을 많이 고증함 또 국제적으로 분쟁지역이라고 함. |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
agneskimjy@naver.com |
|
서론 |
Dear Sir/Madam
I have read your article regarding Dokdo/ Takeshima in your Website. However, I believe some information should be provided for your mis understanding you might have in your statement.
Historically, Dokdo belonged to “Usanguk” during the Three Kingdoms Period, and was referred to as “Usando” during the Joseon Dynasty, when the island was also known as “Jasando,” “Gajido” or “Sambongdo.” Mentions of Usando are found in several Joseon-dynasty historical and geographical treatises, including Jiriji (Book of Geography) of Sejong Sillok (Annals of King Sejong: 1454)
|
|
| 본론 |
Dokdo is Korean territory under international law. Imperial Ordinance No. 41, issued in 1900 by the imperial government of Korea (the Great Han Empire), placed Dokdo under the jurisdiction of the Ulleungdo County Office. Historical evidence clearly shows that Dokdo has never been an unoccupied land (“terra nullius”), and Japan’s alleged incorporation of it is therefore null and void under international law
A series of official documents issued by the Japanese government, including the “Takeshima Incident” dated 1696, Chosenkoku Kosaishimatsu Naitansho of 1870 and a document issued by the Japanese Council of State in 1877, officially recognized that Dokdo was not a part of Japanese territory. 4. It is established beyond any doubt that Dokdo has continued to be an integral part of Korean territory and, therefore, the questions over its legal status are not subject to international adjudication, arbitration or any other means of dispute settlement. That Dokdo is Korean sovereign territory is a fact beyond doubt, and there is no legal uncertainty regarding its territorial status. Thus, the questions over its legal status are not subject to international adjudication, arbitration or any other means of dispute settlement.
|
|
| 결론 |
Japan’s argument that the issue regarding Dokdo should be referred to the International Court of Justice lacks both logical and rational ground in the light of the fact that Korea has maintained its inherent and exclusive territorial sovereignty over Dokdo.
Therefore please understasnd there exists no legal doubt as to Korean sovereignty over Dokdo, and accordingly there is no reason why the island should be brought to an international tribunal, adjudicatory, arbitral or otherwise.
Thank you for reading this letter.
Sincerely yours |
조회 : 951
