|
¼ÇÑ |
½ÃÁ¤¼ÇÑ |
|
¸Åü |
À¥»çÀÌÆ®
|
|
À̽´ |
µ¿ÇØ
|
|
¾ð¾î |
¿µ¾î
|
|
¼ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ |
https://www.wsws.org/en/special/contact.html |
|
¿À·ù³»¿ë |
µ¿Çظ¦ sea of japan À¸·Î Ç¥±âÇÔ |
|
E-mail / Contact |
|
|
¼·Ð |
Dear webmaster. > > > Hello. This is Hae jeong Kim from South Korea. I've been having great attention to > your website. However, I found some miner differences in your article which can be > crucial to Korea. In your article, sea between Korea peninsula and Japan is marked > only as 'Sea of japan', without marking 'East sea' simultaneously. I know that the > official name is 'Sea of japan' but obviously, it should be written in both 'East > sea' and 'Sea of japan'. >
|
|
º»·Ð |
> Actually, throughout Eastern Asia history, for more than 2000 years, this sea has > been "EAST¡¡SEA", not 'Sea of japan'. Since Korean government has joined UN, they > are giving great endeavor to recover legitimacy of the name "East sea", officially > bringing up the problem of marking the name of the sea. And most importantly, > Korean government do not enforce to mark 'East sea' as a only way of naming the > sea. They have already suggested reasonable solution which is to put down both > names which are used in both Korean and Japan government. International > organizations such as UN and International Hydrographic Organization also > recommends to write down both names if the single name is not decided between > related nations. It means that writing down only 'Sea of japan' is the way of > ignoring historical fact and Korean government's effort.
|
|
°á·Ð |
> As a big fan of your site, I strongly suggest that some changes would happen in > your articles. And if you do not mind, could you let me know an e-mail address of the > person in charge or another possible way to correct it, please? > > > Thank you again for your help. I am looking forward to hearing from you. > > > > > > > Yours, sincerely, > Haejeong Kim |