:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 18-08-25 20:18
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : Çϳª°í¹èÁØ¿µ
Á¶È¸ : 650  
https://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/soumu/takesima_eng/
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ soumu@pref.shimane.lg.jp
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ¸¦ Takeshima¶ó Ç¥±â
E-mail / Contact qownsdud1029@naver.com
¼­·Ð

Dear Webmaster

Hello. This is JunYoung Bae, a member of Dokdo Cyber Press of South Korea. I want to tell you about the wrong information on this site.



º»·Ð

https://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/soumu/takesima_eng/

In this page, you are so proudly using the word 'Takeshima'. And you claim that 'Takeshima' is Japan's territory. But 'Takeshima' is misnomer. 'Dokdo' is a correct expression. Cause South korea and Japan is in territorial disputes now, please write down 'Dokdo/Takeshima' at least. And Dokdo is South korea's territory. For its evidence, first, Korean territory, Ulleungdo is more closer to Dokdo than the Oki islands of Japan. Second, and by international law, Dokdo is the territory of the South Korea. In 1900, Great Korean Empire internationally promulgated Dokdo sovereignty of the Joseon Dynasty by edict No. 41 report. It was faster than Japan's announce in 1905. Third, in January 1946, Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers excluded Dokdo from the Japanese territory by SCAPIN 677. There should be other orders or announces to modify United Nations's decision. Since then, however, there have been no other orders or agreements, so the Republic of Korea is owned Dokdo. In addition to, there is also a lot of historical evidence. Please on't try to distort historical facts.



°á·Ð

I beg you change the mark of 'Takeshima' to provide correct information on internet. Thank you for reading a long mail and I will wait your reply. Best regards,

JunYoung Bae


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]