:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 21-02-09 09:20
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : ºÎ»ê¿Ü°íÀ̼¼¸°
Á¶È¸ : 576  
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/takeshima-dokdo-island-dispute-news-and-discussion.237286/
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü  
À̽´  
¾ð¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/takeshima-dokdo-island-dispute-news-and-discussion.237286/
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ ¸íĪ
E-mail / Contact
¼­·Ð
Dear webmaster

Hello, my name is Celine, a member of Dokdo Cyber Press of South Korea.
 I'm contacting you about an article that I read on your website which was about 'Takeshima/Dokdo Island Dispute'. I found that you used a map that named the island Takeshima. So I'm sending this e-mail to kindly ask you to correct it with a map that has a name Dokdo.


º»·Ð

There are some reasons that support why it is Korea¡¯s territory.

Dokdo is located geographically closer to South Korea. Distance between Dokdo and Ulleung Island is about 87.4 km, The distance between Dokdo and okiseom is 157km.

Therefore Dokdo belongs to the Ulleung County land. The Korean Empire, Joseon declared a sovereignty for Dokdo internationally in 1905. Joseon Dynasty is five years faster than Japan. The Japanese government at that time made Dokdo ownerless land so Japan tried to make Dokdo for Japanese territory after incorporation. But Dokdo is Korean territory since Silla general, Yi Sa-bu of Ulleungdo Island occupied Dokdo.



°á·Ð

 I really enjoyed reading articles in your website, but I'm sending an e-mail so that the world could know the truth, or at least don't get confused with false facts about Korea-Japan dispute with Dokdo.

 It could be seen as a minor issue, but I believe that knowing the fact is important to everyone who visits your website. I hope the fact reflected in the website.


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]