:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 21-05-09 23:13
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : Áß´ëºÎ°í±è½Ã¿¬
Á¶È¸ : 586  
https://www.kr.emb-japan.go.jp/territory/takeshima/index.html
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://www.kr.emb-japan.go.jp/territory/takeshima/index.html
¿À·ù³»¿ë Çѱ¹ÀÌ µ¶µµ¸¦ ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¹èÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù.
E-mail / Contact
¼­·Ð
Hello, this is Kim from Korea. 
I am writing this letter because you have insisted that 
our country have not controlled Dokdo as our territory.
Now I am going to tell you why your opinion is wrong. 
Please open your eyes and keep my talk in your mind.
I would like to keep country's connection well.


º»·Ð
First, you have said that "Takeshima is indisputably an inherent 
part of the territory of Japan, in light of historical facts and
 based on international law."
However, after the Second World War end, Japan-where was 
the war criminal country- had a unconditional surrender.
And Japan took out every territory where they had possessed
during the Second World War.
Second, you've said "The Republic of Korea has never 
demonstrated any clear basis for its claims that it had taken
 effective control over Takeshima prior to Japan's effective
 control over Takeshima and reaffirmation of its territorial
 sovereignty in 1905."



°á·Ð
But, Korea have controlled over Dokdo for a long time.
One of those example is that in Taejong 17 year, the king
 Taejong said that since the Japanese try to rob the people 
living in Dokdo, we should let them live in interior.
I hope you had understand what I mean.
Thank you. 

 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]