:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 24-05-11 21:46
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : ÀÌÈ­¿©´ëȲÀ¯Áø
Á¶È¸ : 406  
   https://www.aichi-now.jp/en/spots/detail/137 [397]
https://www.aichi-now.jp/en/spots/detail/137
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://www.aichi-now.jp/en/spots/detail/137
¿À·ù³»¿ë ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó µ¶µµ¸¦ ÀϺ»ÀÇ takeshima¶ó°í Ç¥±â
E-mail / Contact joryung3@naver.com
¼­·Ð

Dear Concerned Reader,

I trust this message finds you well. My name is Yujin Hwang, and I am deeply invested in ensuring the accurate representation of geographical locations, particularly concerning the rightful recognition of "Dokdo."



º»·Ð

I am reaching out regarding an issue I have identified on your platform, specifically the misrepresentation of the islet known as "Takeshima." It is imperative that we address this discrepancy to uphold the integrity of geographical accuracy.

"Takeshima," also known as Liancourt Rocks, is located in the Eastern Sea, situated between Korea and Japan. However, it is essential to underscore that its rightful name and sovereignty are attributed to "Dokdo," contrary to the commonly used designation of "Takeshima" by Japan and other entities.

Upon reviewing your content, I noticed a reference to the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which might inadvertently suggest a misunderstanding regarding the territorial status of Dokdo. I urge you to reconsider this perspective, taking into account the wealth of historical evidence supporting Dokdo's unequivocal status as Korean territory.



°á·Ð

By accurately reflecting Dokdo's designation on your platform, not only do we demonstrate a commitment to factual integrity but also contribute to the dissemination of historical truths and foster mutual understanding among diverse audiences.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I eagerly anticipate your response.

Warm regards,

Yujin Hwang


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]