:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 19-07-19 18:04
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : Çϳª°í¹ÚÁø
Á¶È¸ : 501  
https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Sea-of-Japan-the-next-target-for-Chinese-military2
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´ µ¿ÇØ 
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Sea-of-Japan-the-next-target-for-Chinese-military2
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¿ÇØ Ç¥±â ¿À·ù
E-mail / Contact https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Sea-of-Japan-the-next-target-for-Chinese-military2
¼­·Ð

Hello, I¡¯m Jin Park, student at Hana Academy Seoul, the Republic of Korea. Thank you for providing useful information to us on your Website. However, I read your article and found something to be corrected: The sea between the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese Islands was only written as ¡°Sea of Japan¡±


º»·Ð

The sea between the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese Islands, called as "Sea of Japan" in your article, is also called as ¡°East Sea.¡± So it needs to be corrected. In 1910, Japanese Empire invaded Korea and took control of it for 36 years. During that period, Japanese Empire marked the sea as ¡°Sea of Japan¡± because Koreans lost their sovereignty. But Korea already recovered its sovereignty over than 70 years ago. Therefore, it seems unreasonable to only use the name ¡°Sea of Japan¡± which symbolizes imperialism.


°á·Ð






I humbly ask for you to consider the issue of naming the sea both the ¡°Sea of Japan¡± and ¡°East Sea.¡± Thank you for spending your time reviewing my long letter and I would appreciate it if you reply via my e-mail: jinnyp7@naver.com

 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]