:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 18-05-08 20:06
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : ÀúÇö°íÀÌÁö¿¹
Á¶È¸ : 515  
   https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/03/23/national/politics-diploma¡¦ [204]
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/03/23/national/politics-diplomacy/south-korea-conducted-maritime-surveys-near-disputed-islets-2016/#.WvGByRAh1ZV
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/03/23/national/politics-diplomacy/south-korea-conducted-maritime-surveys-near-disputed-islets-2016/#.WvGByRAh1ZV
¿À·ù³»¿ë Áöµµ¿¡ µ¶µµ¿µÅ並 ´ÙÄɽø¶¶ó À߸øÇ¥±âÇÔ
E-mail / Contact Fax 03-6869-2198
¼­·Ð


Dear, webmester

hi my name is leejiye from korea high school.

while i searched some maps ,unfortunatley i found the map that marked dokdo to takeshima from your website.




º»·Ð

dokdo must mark in dokdo not takeshima.

because dokdo is obviously korean territory.

first, if you serach some history materials there are lots of materials that prove the dokdo is korea's

second, you can find the Abduction of An Yong-bok by Japanese Fishermen(from sungi  sillok)





°á·Ð

i hope you to fix these for the whole world.

 we should know the correct histoy.

Thank you for reding.


 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]