ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 16-05-01 23:24
±Û¾´ÀÌ :
±¸·æÁßÀÌ¿ø¿ì
 Á¶È¸ : 1,506
|
±¸·æÁß ÀÌ¿ø¿ì
|
|
|
¼ÇÑ |
½ÃÁ¤¼ÇÑ |
|
¸Åü |
À¥»çÀÌÆ®
|
|
À̽´ |
|
|
¾ð¾î |
¿µ¾î
|
|
¼ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ |
http://www.kr.emb-japan.go.jp/territory/takeshima/ |
|
¿À·ù³»¿ë |
µ¶µµ°¡ ÀϺ» ¿µÅä¶ó°í Ç¥±â/ÁÖÀåÇÔ |
|
E-mail / Contact |
wonwoo0621@naver.com |
|
¼·Ð |
Dear Webmaster, This is Won Woo Lee From the Northeast Asian History Foundation. I would like you to correct certain information about Dokdo on your website.
|
|
º»·Ð |
You are insisting that The Republic of Korea had never demonstrated any clear basis for Korea's claims to the island. I would like to refer you to the following. In 1695, the central government of Japan inquired the local government of ðèö¢ã¼ about dominion over Dokdo. In its reply to such inquiry, ðèö¢ã¼, a territory of Japan, stated that "Dokdo is not a part of the territory of ðèö¢ã¼."(ñÓÓöªÏì×ÛßÛ×ѽݾáժ˪ƪÏÙíåÙñ¨ý¦) and that "No islands are part of the territory of the ðèö¢ã¼, including Dokdo and Songdo."( ñÓÓöáæÓöÐìèâÕ×ÏÐñýݾáÕªÎÓöÙíåÙñ¨ý¦ÞÀ) So, in 1696, the government of the Japan decided to ban Japanese citizens from going to Dokdo. (reference :ñÓÓöÔ¤úÐ×òÖµ(1696)) According to these historical references, Dokdo is a Korean territory. So I respectfully request that you adhere to the current naming practice and refer to Dokdo by its proper name on your website.
|
|
°á·Ð |
As a fine source for online information, I hope you will be able to make appropriate corrections on your website. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. With Kindest Regards, Won Woo Lee |
|