|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
웹사이트
|
|
| 이슈 |
|
|
| 언어 |
영어
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
https://espresso.economist.com/aeaeb80c3d5feeb0e2c2c7b0938045c2 |
|
| 오류내용 |
Dokdo와 Takeshima를 병기한 지도를 사용함 |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
happyjin6337@gmail.com |
|
서론 |
To whom it may concern I hope this email finds you well. I'm Jinhwan Yoon, a high-schooler from South Korea.
http://liancourt.jugem.jp/ While surfing the web, I came to visit your website above. You have written your assertion on February 22nd, 2019, which claims that Takeshima is the territory of Japan. The websites is using a map with the term 'Takeshima' on it.
|
|
| 본론 |
The map is using the term 'Takeshima' to describe Dokdo. Dokdo is a small rock island in the southeast of the East sea and consists of 91 islands, big and small. Japan is consistently arguing that Dokdo is the territory of Japan, which is why they are using 'Takeshima' to describe it. However, it is clear that Dokdo is the territory of South Korea and the reasons are as follows.
South Korea has known the existence of Dokdo since a very long time ago and numerous historical documents support this. For example in Samguksagi, one of the oldest historical book in Korea, it is recorded that Silla called Dokdo as Usando after king Isabu had conquered Usanguk.
Moreover in the 1500s, Joseon's fisherman An young Bok visited Japan and returned with a paper that says "Ulleungdo and Dokdo is the territory of Joseon. In the1900s, Dokdo was officially incorporated into Gangwon-do province through the forty-first article of Korea's imperial order. Even some documents from Japan says that Dokdo is the appropriate name and that the territory belongs to South Korea.
|
|
| 결론 |
I strongly demand that you make rectification on your website. Actually, I think it might be better to remove your website because it contains no correct information at all.
If you have any questions, please text me back. I look forward to your reply.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely Jinhwan Yoon |
조회 : 968
