:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 22-01-11 17:28
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : ´Ü´ëºÎ°íÀ±Áøȯ
Á¶È¸ : 829  
https://www.nbr.org/publication/the-rough-state-of-japan-south-korea-relations-friction-and-disputes-in-the-maritime-domain/
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ media@nbr.org
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ°¡ ´ëÇѹα¹ÀÇ ¿µÅä¶ó´Â ³»¿ëÀ» ¸í½ÃÇØÁÖ±æ ¹Ù¶÷.
E-mail / Contact happyjin6337@gmail.com
¼­·Ð


Dear The National Bureau of Asian Research,
Hello, webmaster. This is Jinhwan Yoon from South Korea

I have visited your website and read an article about the rough state of Japan-South Korea relations. I appreciate your systematic explanation of a territory dispute between those two countries. but I feel sorry that you didn't specified the fact that Dokdo clearly belongs to South Korea. 

To help your understanding, here's the link!
https://www.nbr.org/publication/the-rough-state-of-japan-south-korea-relations-friction-and-disputes-in-the-maritime-domain/




º»·Ð
FIrst, let me explain why Japan desires Dokdo for its territory. One of the biggest reasons is the resources under Dokdo. Known as 'blazing ice', methane hydrate is buried under the sea near Dokdo. Since it releases less carbon dioxide than coal when burned, methane hydrate is taking the center stage of future eco-friendly resource from all parts of the world.

But Dokdo has never been the territory of Japan and is clearly South Korea's territory. Numerous historical records support this fact. In Samguksagi - one of the oldest existing historical books - there is a record that An Yong-bok, who was the fisherman of Silla, conquered Usanguk. Also, the distance between the Oki island, the nearest island of Japan from Dokdo, is about 157 kilometers, which is approximately 68 kilometers farther than Korea's Ulleungdo. The Sejong chronicles, the official letter during Joseon dynasty, also mentions that the distance between Ulleungdo and Dokdo is close enough to see Dokdo from the other if the weather is fine. In 1900, Dokdo was officially incorporated into Gangwon-do province through the forty-first article of Korea's imperial order. Even some documents in Japan support that 'Dokdo' is the appropriate name and 


°á·Ð
It would have been better if you had ended your article with the conclusion that despite the assertion from Japan, Dokdo belongs to South Korea, undoubtedly. Since you own youtube, facebook, and twitter account too, such correction will help deliver correct historical fact to more people.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,
Jinhwan Yoon

 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]