:::::: ³ª¶ó[µ¶µµ]»ì¸®±â¿îµ¿º»ºÎ ::::::
ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 21-07-25 09:07
 ±Û¾´ÀÌ : °æÈñ°í¼Û¹Î°â
Á¶È¸ : 952  
   https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/ryodo_eg/shiryo/takeshima/detail/t19590925001¡¦ [516]
https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/ryodo_eg/shiryo/takeshima/detail/t1959092500102.html
¼­ÇÑ ½ÃÁ¤¼­ÇÑ 
¸Åü À¥»çÀÌÆ® 
À̽´  
¾ð¾î ¿µ¾î
¼­ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/ryodo_eg/shiryo/takeshima/detail/t1959092500102.html
¿À·ù³»¿ë µ¶µµ¸¦ ´ÙÄɽø¶¶ó°í Ç¥½ÃÇÔ
E-mail / Contact roy9144@naver.com
¼­·Ð
Hello my name is mingyumsong and I am a highschool student of South Korea.
I was looking at your website and found out that 
you are insisting Dokdo is Japan's territory and you used Takeshima instead of Dokdo.
I would like you to modify your mistake so that 
visitors of your website do not get wrong information.



º»·Ð
   
Dokdo is korea's cultural property. 
However from 19th century, Japan keep insisting that Dokdo is their land and started to use Takeshima instead of Dokdo. Reasons why Japan says Dokdo is their land is because they found it first and nobody was living there when they first found it. However from historical data, it is easy to find that there is a record from 16th century in which Dokdo was painted. Also, from Sanfrancisco treaty in 1952, it is said that Dokdo belongs to Korea. 
Therefore, Dokdo is explicitly Korea's territory and it should be called as Dokdo instead of Takeshima.


°á·Ð
   
It will be very thankful if you change your expression 'takeshima' into Dokdo. 
If you have any question, please contact roy9144@naver.com.
Thank you for reading this long email.

 
   
 

¼­ÇѼö½Åó  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Á¦¸ñ  [º¹»çÇϱâ]
Ä£¼±¼­Çѳ»¿ë  [º¹»çÇϱâ]