|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
웹사이트
|
|
| 이슈 |
|
|
| 언어 |
영어
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
https://english.kyodonews.net/contact |
|
| 오류내용 |
한국 정부가 일본 교과서내의 독도에 관한 묘사에 대해 일본 교육성에 항의하자 이를 거절했다고 보도하면서 독도 ( Takeshima ) 가 일본 고유의 영토라고 주장함 |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
agneskimjy@naver.com |
|
서론 |
Dear Madam/Sir
I am writing to inform you the mis- understanding you might have as I have read your statement in your Newspaper. Your claim to Dokdo was known as Takeshima which is Japanese territory is groundless and not true.
Before looking at the problems with your site, we need to know what kind of island Dokdo is. Dokdo is an island located between Korea and Japan, and is geometrically a little closer to Korea The historical research proved that in 1661. A Japanese named Otani, who lived in Yonago of Hoki Province, took refuge on Ulleungdo during a typhoon. Ulleungdo had been vacant since early Joseon because of the island evacuation order.
|
|
| 본론 |
Dokdo became the territory of Korea about 1,500 years ago when King Jijeung of Silla ordered Isabu to incorporate Usanguk into Silla in the 13th year of King Jijeung (512). It is recorded in Samguksagi (The History of the Three Kingdoms) as follows: "In June of the 13th year of King Jijeung, Usanguk submitted to Silla and decided to offer local products every year. Usanguk is an island due east of Myeongju (Gangneung today), and also called Ulleungdo." It is also recorded in Goryeosajiriji (Geographical Record of the History of Goryeo) that: "Usando and Mureungdo are two islands which are not far away from each other, so they can be seen when the weather is clear and no wind blows." Sejong-sillokjiriji (Geographical Record of the Annals of King Sejong) includes an entry: "The two islands, Usan and Mureung, are in the sea due east of the prefecture. They are not far away from each other so they are visible in clear weather. They were known as Usanguk in Silla.".
|
|
| 결론 |
Japan’s argument that the issue regarding Dokdo should be referred to the International Court of Justice lacks both logical and rational ground in the light of the fact that Korea has maintained its inherent and exclusive territorial sovereignty over Dokdo.
Therefore please understasnd there exists no legal doubt as to Korean sovereignty over Dokdo, and accordingly there is no reason why the island should be brought to an international tribunal, adjudicatory, arbitral or otherwise.
Thank you for reading this letter.
Sincerely yours |
조회 : 974
