작성일 : 22-06-22 22:45
|
글쓴이 :
숙명여고윤혜성
 조회 : 973
|
|
https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20220602/p2g/00m/0in/059000c
|
 |
|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
웹사이트
|
|
| 이슈 |
|
|
| 언어 |
영어
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
https://mainichi.jp/english/contact/ |
|
| 오류내용 |
한국의 해양탐사선이 일본의 배타적 경제수역인 Takeshima 근처에서 행하여졌다고 보도함 |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
agneskimjy@naver.com |
|
서론 |
To whom it may concern, I am a high school student of Korea . While I read your website , I realized your article is not delivering correct information. Your website article about Dokdo / Takeshima dispute has addressed this matter as a controvercial issue. but I should say that this is totally wrong. Dokdo is Korean Territory. The Japanese government, despite historical records proving Korean sovereignty over Dokdo Island, keeps falsely claiming that the island is part of Japan. There is not a speck of evidence proving that Dokdo belongs to Korea. The attitude of Japanese Government, however, is simply an attempt at historical deception. |
|
|
| 본론 |
The correct notation for the island is "Dokdo", and it is a part of the South Korean Territory.However, the page calls the island as "Takeshima", and is showing the monuments of Japan. In addition, the map that comes with the page shows that Dokdo is a part of South Korea, but notates the islands as "The Liancourt Rocks", which is another wrong notation. I would thank you if you could correct these errors.
An incident in 1693 involving the Korean fisherman An Yong-bok is a major historical case proving the territorial right of Korea, then called Joseon, to Dokdo Island. At the time, the Tokugawa shogunate of Japan acknowledged Dokdo and Ulleungdo islands as Joseon territory after receiving a report from the Tokugawa Domain, where An stayed, saying, "Neither Ulleungdo nor Dokdo is domain territory." The shogunate prohibited passage to the two islands and informed the Joseon court of its ban. This incident thus confirms that both Ulleungdo and Dokdo are Korean territory under international law. |
|
|
| 결론 |
Dokdo is Korean territory that has never been uninhabited. For this reason, Japan's territorial claim to the island is null and void because the doctrine of terra nullius, which grants the occupier of land belonging to no one ownership of the latter, does not apply to Dokdo. The Meiji government’s decision to initially call Dokdo Korean territory and then later claim it as Japanese territory violates the principle of no deliberation of the same measure twice in the same legislative session. This is also a violation of the Meiji constitution and international law. Therefore, I humbly ask you that you deliver the truth of Dokdo accordingly to your readers worldwide.
Thank you for reading/ |
|
