|
| 서한 |
시정서한 |
|
| 매체 |
웹사이트
|
|
| 이슈 |
|
|
| 언어 |
영어
|
|
| 서한보내는곳 |
https://historysshadow.wordpress.com/tag/liancourt-rocks/ |
|
| 오류내용 |
글에서 독도를 liancourt rocks라고 표기함 |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
happyjin6337@gmail.com |
|
서론 |
Dear webmaster, I hope this email finds you well. I'm Jinhwan Yoon from South Korea.
Today, I visited your website that covers territorial disputes with countries of Asia. While reading, I was able to find a fallacy in your writing. To help your understanding, here's the link.
https://historysshadow.wordpress.com/tag/liancourt-rocks/
|
|
| 본론 |
As you can see, the article uses 'liancourt rocks' to describe the island that is under dispute. Discovering Dokdo in 1849, Europeans gave the name 'liancourt rocks' to this island after the name if the ship they took.
However, Dokdo is surely the territory of South Korea. Let me tell you some reasons.
South Korea had known about the existence of 'Dokdo' since a very long time ago and countless historical documents support this. For example, in Samguksagi, the oldest historical book in Korea, there is a record that Silla called Dokdo as 'Usando' after king Isabu had conquered Usanguk. Moreover in the 1500s, An Young Bok - Joseon's fisherman during the 17th century - visited Japan and returned with a paper that says "Ulleungdo and Dokdo is the territory of Joseon."
In 1900, Dokdo was officially incorporated into Gangwon-do province through the forty-first article of Korea's imperial order. Even some documents in Japan support that Dokdo belongs to South Korea.
|
|
| 결론 |
Thus, it can be absolutely said that describing Dokdo as liancourt rocks, just because Europeans discovered it is inappropriate. They are not even the first to discover Dokdo.
I ask you to make corrections on your website. I look forward to your reply.
Sincerely Jinhwan Yoon |
조회 : 965
